01.10.2009
Claim for integrated water research policy in Europe
The workshop 'Water for Integration - Integration for Water' took place in Brussels on September 28, 2009. This event provided a platform for participants from different sectors to discuss barriers and needs relating to integrated water research. The workshop was organized by the Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE) and the European Water Partnership (EWP
Quelle: (idw) Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung ISOEOn Monday, September 28, the European workshop 'Water for
Integration - Integration for Water' organized by the Institute for
Social-Ecological Research (ISOE) in cooperation with the European Water
Partnership (EWP) took place in Brussels. The participants included scientists,
representatives and decision makers from European institutions, research funding
agencies and the private sector. As Thomas Kluge from ISOE subsumed in his
closing remarks, they are calling on politicians to promote integrated research
in the water sector and are appealing to researchers to launch joint initiatives
and look beyond the water cycle. To this end, the participants explored
requirements and barriers concerning integration in current water research, and
demonstrated approaches with which to tackle the issue. Furthermore, they
established ways of facilitating an open exchange between science and policy
makers along with means of developing recommendations for future European Union
research policy related to water and integration.
Today, water represents
one of the most explosive issues confronting societies. Decision makers at all
levels are being called upon to find long-lasting solutions for pressing water
problems. Cristina Gutiérres-Cortines from the European Parliament emphasized
the fact that "politicians have to deal with a highly complex field driven by a
multitude of controversial interests" and pointed out "the need to reduce this
complexity to practical, responsible and transparent decisions". Furthermore,
the heterogeneity of this field is mirrored in various debates: water as a
resource and a sink of pollutants, the social and ecological functions of
aquatic ecosystems, the future design of water infrastructure, and the
importance of sustainability in the management of river basins. There is an
evident need for water to be assessed in all its dimensions, namely economic,
social, environmental and cultural. "Multi-dimensional assessments can help in
the prioritisation of action" said scientist Caroline Sullivan from Southern
Cross University, Australia.
However, the actual practice of integrated
water research still remains the exception rather than the rule. This is shown
by the lack of an intermediate platform between science, decision makers and
stakeholders, which was one of the points addressed during the panel discussion.
Integrated water research poses a great challenge for policy makers, funding
agencies, evaluators and the scientists themselves, despite being a vital source
of knowledge for pressing political decisions and their sustainable
implementation. With this in mind, Andrea Tilche from the European Commission
emphasized that "integrated water research is needed to help people to think out
of their box". A barrier to this lies in the traditional divisions between
research communities and, in particular, the cultural rift between the natural,
engineering and social sciences, a situation which is reflected in research
policy and its implementation. It is rare to find adequate funding schemes or
joint calls for integrated research here, and transparent quality criteria and
evaluation methods for such research are still lacking.
The workshop
complements the policy review process initiated by the EWP in 2008, through
which the 'Water Vision for Europe for 2030' was developed and presented at the
5th World Water Forum in Istanbul. The outcomes of the 'Water for Integration -
Integration for Water' workshop will feed directly into the 3rd Aquawareness
stakeholder meeting in Brussels on September 29, 2009 and thereby into the
vision mapping process which concludes the EWP's policy review process.